Hindsight, they say, is 20/20. Looking back at past predictions, especially those made by prominent figures in the investment world, can offer valuable insights into market dynamics and the evolution of technology. In the case of NVIDIA (NVDA), a stock that has seen meteoric rise, revisiting past assessments can shed light on the challenges of predicting future market trends, even for seasoned investors.
On August 5th, several media outlets reported famous activist hedge fund Elliott Management’s statements about AI hype and NVDA bubble. We summarized those statements in an article:
“Billionaire Paul Singer’s Elliott Management has reportedly said in a latest letter to investors that mega-cap AI tech stocks are in “bubble land” and Nvidia is “overhyped.” The fund said in its letter that it’s skeptical about the notion that technology companies will keep buying AI chips in high volumes in the future, adding that AI is “overhyped with many applications not ready for prime time”. It also claimed that many AI use cases are “never going to be cost-efficient, are never going to actually work right, will take up too much energy, or will prove to be untrustworthy.” The fund reportedly said in its letter that AI is in effect software that has failed to deliver “value commensurate with the hype”.
The $66 billion Elliott Management founded by billionaire Paul Singer, who is one of the most feared activist investors in the US, said there are “few real uses” of AI other than “summarizing notes of meetings, generating reports and helping with computer coding”.
Paul Singer of Elliott Management
Elliott’s letter was dated July 30th and predicted that the AI bubble will burst when NVDA ” has bad numbers and breaks the spell.”. Here is an excerpt from that letter:
“Speaking of NVIDIA . . .
